conventionaddressedf_1
No mention of @acme/http for outbound calls
The plan doesn't reference the internal HTTP client at all. If any outbound calls are made, using raw fetch or axios would violate the team convention and bypass any centralized auth, timeout, or retry wiring baked into @acme/http.
conventionaddressedf_2
No observability registration mentioned
The plan makes no mention of registering with @acme/observability. Any new endpoint that skips this won't appear in traces, making it invisible during incidents and impossible to correlate with upstream calls.
complianceaddressedf_3
PII logging risk not addressed
The plan says nothing about what gets logged or how request bodies are handled. If any request body contains user data, logging it would violate the team's PII compliance rule and potentially regulatory requirements.
conventionaddressedf_4
Retry strategy not specified
There is no mention of @acme/retry or idempotency-key headers for any operations in the plan. Without this, transient failures won't be handled consistently and duplicate writes become a risk on retried calls.
simplicityaddressedf_5
Plan is too vague to audit meaningfully
The plan body is just 'smoke test plan' with no described steps, components touched, or scope. It's impossible to assess edge cases, ownership, or compliance posture from this level of detail, so real risks may be hidden.